A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG456UCZD
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

The AOC AG456UCZD's larger size and ultra-wide aspect ratio make it excellent for immersive gaming and multitasking, but its lower image clarity might not be ideal for sharp text and detailed productivity work. In contrast, the LG 32GS95UE offers better image clarity, higher resolution, and is suitable for a variety of uses including productivity, media consumption, and gaming on a more traditional aspect ratio. If you're focused on competitive gaming, both have low response times and high refresh rates. For intense color work, both are strong choices. Pick the AOC for an expansive gaming experience, or the LG for versatile use and clearer text. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
  • The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

3.8
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
7.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.9
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
8.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.0
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
6.2
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming.

Cost

$1,400
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
$1,400
Product imageProduct image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,400.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,400
$1,400
Screen Size
44.5"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
32
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,500
Recommendations made
18,075
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo