A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Predator X45
Company ProductName Specs




PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for a large, ultra-wide display with high responsiveness and variable refresh rate, the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is a natural choice. Its large screen and high refresh rate make for an immersive gaming experience. However, it’s not the best for productivity due to its lower resolution and text quality. In contrast, the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) offers better clarity and higher resolution, making it suitable for detailed photo editing and enjoying high-resolution media, but it has lower refresh rates, which isn't ideal for fast-paced gaming. Consider the Asus if image quality in creative work and media consumption is your priority, despite being more expensive. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.4
Predator X45
PA27DCE
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

4.0
Predator X45
PA27DCE
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.1
Predator X45
PA27DCE
8.4
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,200
Predator X45
PA27DCE
$1,999
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,200 and the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) costs $1,999.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

Yes
Predator X45
PA27DCE
No
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
Predator X45
PA27DCE
9.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
Predator X45
PA27DCE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
PA27DCE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
PA27DCE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,200
$1,999
Screen Size
45"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.01 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
23
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
59,600
Recommendations made
8,940
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo