Acer Aspire 5 17 vs ASUS Vivobook 14

For general use, both the Acer Aspire 5 17 and ASUS Vivobook 14 have adequate display characteristics like resolution and brightness, which are essential for tasks like web browsing and document editing, offering a satisfactory visual experience. In engineering and design, however, both laptops lack wider color gamuts, like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB, which are crucial for accurately rendering colors in professional graphics work, resulting in a fair but not ideal screen quality for these activities. For gaming and 3D applications where smooth motion is key, the lower refresh rates of both screens mean less fluid visuals compared to higher-end gaming laptops, making them less suitable for fast-paced or visually intensive tasks.

The Acer Aspire 5 17 has a larger screen and more storage, which enhances user experience for general tasks, but it's heavier and less portable compared to the ASUS Vivobook 14, which boasts greater portability and better speaker quality despite its smaller screen size and less storage. Both laptops have similar CPU and RAM, ensuring adequate performance for everyday activities, but the Acer offers better heat management, ensuring it remains cool during extended use, which the ASUS may not handle as effectively.

The Acer Aspire 5 17 offers a fair gaming and 3D experience mainly due to its dedicated GPU and satisfactory screen refresh rate, despite having a less powerful CPU and lower screen quality than the ASUS Vivobook 14, which also has a fair rating for gaming and 3D owing to its adequate GPU and decent screen qualities, including refresh rate and pixel density.

The Acer Aspire 5 17 and ASUS Vivobook 14 are both considered fair for engineering and design use due to their similar CPUs and integrated GPUs, which offer adequate but not top-tier performance for such tasks, and both have sufficient RAM for moderate workloads. The Acer has a larger screen, which may be helpful for design tasks, while the ASUS is more portable and has a better portability score, making it a preferable option for users who need to move around frequently.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.