Dell Inspiron 16 5620 vs Dell Inspiron 16 5625

The Dell Inspiron 16 5620 and 5625 both provide a balance of strong performance for general use, with capable CPU and adequate RAM ensuring smooth multitasking and application performance. They also boast screens of good quality with the same size and resolution, while maintaining portability with relatively light weight and compact dimensions; however, note that the 5625 model offers a touchscreen option which the 5620 does not, adding a level of convenience for interaction at the cost of potentially shorter battery life due to additional power consumption.

The Dell Inspiron 16 5620's gaming and 3D capabilities are limited by its Intel i5-1235U Iris Xe GPU, which is suitable for light gaming but not for high-end game graphics, and its screen refreshes at a typical 60Hz, which is standard for good image quality but not ideal for fast-paced gaming that benefits from higher refresh rates.

The Dell Inspiron 16 5620 and Inspiron 16 5625 are both suitable for engineering and design use because they feature powerful CPUs, ample RAM, and high-quality IPS screens with good color coverage and resolution, ensuring smooth performance and visual clarity for detailed work. While the 5620 is equipped with an Intel CPU and integrated GPU, the 5625 houses an AMD CPU with stronger integrated graphics, which may benefit graphics-intensive tasks; both models share similar portability and build quality, with good keyboards and sufficient battery life for moderate usage.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

If you're using a laptop for general activities like browsing, watching movies, or working on documents, both the Dell Inspiron 16 5620 and 5625 offer screens that are sufficient, providing ample resolution and brightness, but they might not stand out for sharpness or color. For engineering and design work where color accuracy is key, the fair rating indicates these laptops may not cover professional color spaces as effectively, possibly affecting the fidelity of your visual projects. However, for gaming and 3D work, the lower refresh rates imply that you won't experience the smoothness found in higher-end gaming laptops, and while the resolutions are decent, the panel type may not provide the most immersive experience.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.